... here is Gefter: "Pitting the multiverse against religion presents a false dichotomy. Science never boils down to a choice between two alternative explanations. It is always plausible that both are wrong and a third or fourth or fifth will turn out to be correct."
The reason why this is not a good response is that the argument goes much deeper than specific hypotheses. In my earlier blog, I suggested that this was a good case study for the use of Dembski's design filter, with explanatory approaches based on Law, Chance and Design. In the context of the Multiverse, we are not dealing with specific theories, but contrasting paradigms: Law & Chance versus Design. This does lead to a dichotomy, not between science and religion, but between secularist science and theistic science.
Gefter does not realise she is in a hole, so she keeps digging.
(From Denyse: It could get messy too ... I blogged on this here. Unique ideas.)
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Physicist to pop science writer: In a hole? Stop digging!
Here David Tyler advises,